By Dr Masimba Mavaza
In many rural communities, development is welcomed—but only when it follows the rules of respect, transparency and consultation. When these principles are ignored, even well-intended projects can turn into sources of deep conflict.
This is the reality now facing one community where plans to establish a school have sparked tension, accusations and a breakdown of trust between traditional leaders, church figures and self-styled benefactors.
At the centre of the dispute are allegations that children are being enticed to attend a proposed school through unusually large sums of money.
Community leaders question how a child can be lured with as much as US$850 when established primary and secondary schools charge as little as US$48 in fees. To them, this raises red flags—not only about the source of the money, but also about the motives behind the project.
“This is not how genuine education development works,” Chief Murinye said. “No proper school recruits children with cash handouts. Schools are built through community agreement, not by buying loyalty.”
Beyond the money, the issue has exposed a deeper wound: a perceived lack of respect for traditional authority.
Chiefs Murinye added that they were sidelined in decisions that directly affect their land and their people.
In Zimbabwean culture, development on communal land requires consultation with and approval from traditional leaders. Skipping this step is widely seen as an insult.
“You cannot come into my area, claim you are building a school, and ignore the chief,” Chief Murinye argued. “That is not development; that is provocation.”
The controversy has also drawn in church dynamics and politics. Some accuse the school’s founder of presenting himself as apolitical when it suits him, yet seeking influence and favour during election periods.
Others claim the project has been personalised—treated as private property rather than a community asset—fueling suspicion and resistance.
There are also claims that misinformation has been deliberately spread by individuals allegedly paid to sway opinion.
Chief Murinye highlighted that this has confused community members and turned them against each other. “People are being misled,” said one elder. “And when lies are funded, they travel fast.”
Despite the heated exchanges, there are calls for dialogue rather than division. Traditional leaders insist they are not against development, churches, or schools.
What they demand is process: proper meetings, clear resolutions, transparency around funding, and respect for existing leadership structures.
“We work with pastors, we work with communities,” a chief emphasized. “But no one must come saying ‘it’s my money’ and forget that this land belongs to the people”, he added.
As things stand, the school has no formally approved resolution, and tensions remain high. Yet many believe the conflict can still be resolved, if all parties are willing to sit down, speak honestly, and put the community first.
In the end, the dispute is not just about a school.
It is about dignity, accountability, and the fundamental question of how development should happen. Without respect and transparency, even the biggest promises can ring hollow.
Comments
About Author
